The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o Waikato
Faculty of Science and Engineering - Te Mātauranga Pūtaiao me te Pūkaha
Waikato Home Waikato Home > Science & Engineering > BioBlog
Staff + Student Login

human facial features the result of being used as a punching bag? somehow I don't think so

I saw this story in the newspaper yesterday, & again today on one of the science feeds

Researchers in the US have studied the skulls of ancient human ancestors and concluded that fist-fighting may have played a role in shaping the male face.

You can read the paper itself here (Carrier & Morgan, 2014). I'm sorry, but to me it reads like a just-so story. Just because modern humans take a swing at each other from time to time, doesn't mean that this was the case for earlier hominins. The authors of the paper argue that the facial features of robust australopithecines are the result of natural selection acting through bare-fist fighting. However, they don't offer any actual evidence that this might have happened: nothing on whether paranthropine skulls show the sort of facial damage that you might expect if fighting in this way was sufficiently widespread to act as a selective force. And similarly, no real discussion of whether Paranthropus could form a fist capable of doing such damage. (The paper on Australopithecus sediba to which they refer actually describes sediba's hand as a mosaic of features.) In other words, they're making a sweeping assumption - that paranthropines routinely beat the heck out of each other - to support the a priori assumption that our own facial evolution was shaped by this.

There's also the question of whether modern human faces show much evidence of having evolved in this way; they actually seem quite prone to damage. Noses & cheekbones are rather susceptible to damage, and the bones of the cranium - thinner than those of Paranthropus - are dangerously easy to break. At the same time, according to the authors' speculative view, our hands are particularly well adapted to deliver blunt-force trauma.

This quote from the paper (emphasis mine) says it for me; we really are dealing with conjecture & imagination: 

Starting with the hand of an arboreal great ape ancestor, it is possible to imagine a number of evolutionary transformations that would have resulted in a club-like structure adapted for fighting.

Rudyard Kipling might have appreciated it - a point also made by Brian Switek in his excellent commentary over at National Geographic.

Carrier, D. & Morgan, M. (2014) Protective buttressing of the hominin face. Biological Reviews doi: 10/1111/brv.12112


| | Comments (4)
Share via Email Share this on Twitter Share this on Google+ Share this on Facebook


I thought science is when you make up a story and pick a few facts that seem to fit it for your evidence?

That story feels like Riddled territory.
Do the authors have any suggestions as to what the hominid face would have evolved into, in the *absence* of fisticuffs as an evolutionary pressure? Have they considered the further possibility that human buttocks are well-padded as an evolutionary response to the pressure of kicks from behind?

oooh, for once I have scooped Riddled!? I was thinking I might give this paper to my first-years to consider; they've done a good job of picking apart some other 'questionable' pieces I've handed them.

Leave a comment

June 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Recent Comments

  • herr doktor bimler: Caught up with you now! read more
  • Alison Campbell: oooh, for once I have scooped Riddled!? I was thinking read more
  • herr doktor bimler: That story feels like Riddled territory. Do the authors have read more
  • ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©: I thought science is when you make up a story read more